Nov 6, 2007

A Regional Dilemma: What Role Can the Southeastern Asian Nations Play in Myanmar’s Affairs?

With the never-ending unrest (as seen in the image to the left) in Myanmar as I have mentioned in my previous post, the international community’s attempt to calm the matter was through sanctions. Its goal is to deprive the military junta of any foreign exchange earnings, in hopes of impairing its economy. However, these sanctions have not been very effective (pictured below) because not all of the nations uphold the sanctions. Some of these countries are those from the Southeast Asian region. Countries such as China and Singapore are still trading with the junta and fueling it with military equipments. Thus, this has inspired me to explore the blogsphere to see what others thought on the matter of Southeastern nations supporting the military junta. In my search, I found two well-developed blogs in Blogger. The first blog post, “State Terrorism, Agonies of Myanmar & Regional Stability (2-3)”, was authored by Mg Yin, a Burmese, who has very strong feelings in favoring immediate regional military invention in Burma The other blog post, "Sleeping With the Enemy", belonged to Andrew Sheldon, a UNSW graduate, whose area of interest is global politics. For each of the blog, I commented on the content of their post and my responses can be found below.

“State Terrorism, Agonies of Myanmar & Regional Stability (2-3)”

Comment:

First of all, I want to commend you on your post. I can see the passion and devotion you put into this piece. Like you, I do believe that something should be done about the military regime. However, I thought your argument to initiate military action from the ASEAN family was particularly weak. I noticed that you brought up the matter of human rights violations in Burma as the reason for invention when you said, “[we must fight against the] inhuman dictatorship and their Fascism of killing its people.” It is true bringing up the matter of human mistreatment is a very persuasive tactic to stir up a social movement, but not a very effective way to change a government’s foreign policy. Most governments today are not interested in moral issues, and it is often the last concern when it comes to foreign policy. I think the only way to convince the ASEAN family to get involved is by targeting their economic interest. If there is something to gain through intervention such as resources, many of the ASEAN countries would step in immediately to stop this atrocity, knowing that they have access to resources that can proliferate their economy. However, the problem with this tactic is that it is not definite that these countries will gain access to the resources depending on the new government’s policy.

“Sleeping With the Enemy”

Comment:

First of all, I thought you made a good argument on the unlikeness of military intervention by China and Singapore. Like the fact that you mention how China and Singapore’s national interests overpower their moral righteousness. It is apparent today that most countries, especially those in the South Asian region, are always looking out for their economic interest and always wanting to make a profit. As you pointed out, the trade interest lies in “energy resources – offshore gas”, which have escalated investments in Burma from many bordering countries. Thus, China and Singapore will not give up the opportunity to get a hold of that natural reserve. Rather than militarily intervening in Burma’s internal affairs, they are investing millions of dollars in supporting the military junta.

Second of all, I disagree with your assumption that military intervention is unlikely to happen at all when you said, “I just don’t see it happening.” I think an intrusion is unlikely at this moment because their national interest is not being threatened, but it will become the only practical solution in the near future. We must consider that the arrests and beatings in Burma will escalate in a migration of Burmese to bordering countries such as China. This will cause a border dilemma as refugees pour in by the thousands, which would result in human trafficking, illegal immigration, and the spread of viral diseases. Hence, this becomes a threat to China’s national interest because they cannot fully accommodate for all of the refugees. This would leave most homeless and jobless, resulting in a rise in poverty level, and the citizens becoming prone to infectious diseases through mere interaction, which would leave China in a health crisis. By and large, I believe that military intervention will occur soon enough once China realizes that its national interest is threatened by those factors I presented.

4 comments:

Rafyukes said...

TP,

Very interesting post! I had not heard a lot about the situation in Burma and you did an excellent and to-the-point, job of informing your readers of it. In regards to your first response to “State Terrorism, Agonies of Myanmar & Regional Stability (2-3)”, you bring up an excellent point that the best way for getting other countries of the ASEAN family to intervene and help the Burmese people is by “targeting their economic interest”. It is almost like hitting them in their “sweet spot”. In the world of politics, no one will do anything for another unless there are benefits that they themselves can get from that particular action. This is a simple fact of politics and it is very sad that the horrific state that the Burmese people are in will not stir any action. One thing I would have liked for you to clear up was [when you mentioned in regards to other countries acquiring resources], “However, the problem with this tactic is that it is not definite that these countries will gain access to the resources depending on the new government’s policy.” Maybe you could have gone a little more in depth in regards to the details of the new government’s policy and especially what could prevent countries such as China to acquire desirable resources because of it.
As for your response to “Sleeping With the Enemy”, you make a good point saying that besides economic interest fueling neighboring countries to help Burma, a threat to the safety of their country might stir them to help. But do you think that these countries would be willing to sacrifice some of the well-being of their people if they were able to form alliance’s with the military junta of Burma and gain some profit from it? It seems to me that if they really did care about the safety and health of people, they would have already intervened in Burma. However, their motives are others and only a political and economic gain will arouse any response. It is not a clear thing on how things will turn out, but I do hope that you keep your audience updated with your thoughts on the situation.

GZP said...

Thank you for writing an engaging post about such a pressing issue. I’m currently taking a Terrorism and Genocide class, and the situation in Myanmar looks like it is headed towards genocide, an international crime. Your links and blog post choices are effective; you choose both a person directly influence by the conflict, and someone with a background in economics. I enjoyed your comments on Yin’s post. You commend her argument, but you also offer another idea to the plate, economics. You’re right when you say that governments are not compelled enough by morality. There needs to be incentive, and you give a very rational explanation of how to initiate action against the junta. As for your comments on Sheldon’s post, I also would like to praise you for your efforts. You offer quotes in both of your comments, and you made an excellent argument, predicting the fate of the countries surrounding Burma if nothing is done to save the country. You wrote, “We must consider that the arrests and beatings in Burma will escalate in a migration of Burmese to bordering countries such as China.” Many countries are not isolated; if violence happens in one country, the refugees flee to bordering countries. This is one of the signature traits of a genocide and major international problem. I also partially agree that Sheldon’s skepticism of a military intervention is unrealistic. The United States has a history of ignoring external genocide because of its own self-interests and security; China also is trying to secure its interests. With that being said, I also can see why China would have to intervene in the conflict. Although your post was very interesting, I have a few suggestions below:

The first sentence of your post, which should be a strong introduction, is a bit unclear. If you could rearrange the wording, this would make your piece stronger. Also within the introduction paragraph, you write, “uphold the sanctions” when it should probably be past tense, using “upheld” instead. When you discuss that some countries are still funding Burma, you can connect that sentence with its following sentence. There is a period missing after the sentence describing Mg Yin’s qualifications. As for the spacings that lead up to your post, try to condense the title of the post, “comment:” and your comment together. This is merely for aesthetic purposes. Also, if you could make your pictures a little bigger, that would be greatly appreciated!

Keto Breeze ACV Gummies said...

Toxins are harmful substances that are derived from food, water, cleaning products, and other environmental sources that we are exposed to regularly.

Medication is not generally required at this point, although it may be prescribed proactively. Initial patient assessments are often conducted at this point. Rich in Medium-Chain Triglycerides and high in lauric acid, coconut oil is also a powerful antibacterial.

https://www.offerplox.com/weight-loss/keto-breeze/

https://www.supplementz.org/gold-coast-keto/
https://www.supplementz.org/vibez-keto-gummies/
https://www.supplementz.org/keto-breeze-acv-gummies/
https://www.offerplox.com/weight-loss/go-keto-gummies/
https://www.offerplox.com/weight-loss/gold-coast-keto/
https://www.offerplox.com/weight-loss/vibez-keto-gummies/
https://www.offerplox.com/weight-loss/triplex-keto-gummies/

Lifetime Fitness said...


"Tried your mobility routine this morning and my body feels amazing. Definitely adding it to my weekly plan!"

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.