Oct 29, 2007

Burma: Closing its Doors on Health Care

Burma, also known as Myanmar, has been a main topic of controversy in the news. The country is in turmoil, fueled by an oppressive military junta and civilian demonstrators, due to the junta's unwillingness to loosen the dictatorial grip on the country's political, economic, and social structure. Because of this, many of the inhabitants have begun to protest, however, with very little progress as the junta counters by military force. According to BBC news, many are arrested and killed through the use of baton charges and tear gas.

Though it is distressing to see this kind of violence, what is also occurring is a health care crisis within the country that should be addressed immediately. Even before the start of the rebellion, the Burmese health system has been anything but adequate. To confirm this fact, “the World Health Report 2000, graded Myanmar 190th in overall health system performance of 191 countries." What places Myanmar as the world’s second worst health system is negligence from the military government to implement health regulations and build public clinics. The regime is too occupied with maintaining its authoritarian power through military spending (as seen to the left), thereby disregarding the severity of the health dilemma. A statement from the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization (UNPO) noted, “The regime has more than doubled the size of the military and slashed its spending on health care to less than $1 per person per year." This leaves many Burmese vulnerable to illnesses and diseases. State-run medical facilities are unequipped to provide clinical assistance to the poorer provinces. Given the lack of treatments, “almost 90 of Burma’s 52 million population[s] are at risk of malaria, and […] with nearly 9, 700 [tuberculosis] cases detected every year. […] A third of children are chronically malnourished, 15 of the population is food insecure, and the under-5 mortality rate is 106 per 1000.” If the government does not take notice of this crucial matter soon, maintaining power would not be the only predicament that it will face in the future.

The government’s lack of initative to spend on health care has caught the attention of many humanitarian organizations. Agencies, like the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Doctors Without Borders, have sent up medical supplies and clinical institutions to aid the people. However, the junta, in fear of dissent to overthrow the government, has imposed limitations on the travel of aid and health volunteers. This only resulted in “many international medical charities […] winding up their operations in Burma, […] citing government restrictions on [their] movement made functioning nearly impossible.” As more civil society organizations leave the country, the public is left to fend for themselves; some are even willing to flee the country to find medical relief, dangerously crossing the border into countries such as Thailand and Cambodia. There are a few who do receive clinical services, but “many patients come too late and died in the clinic (as pictured to the right), while newborn babies and the elderly are sometimes abandoned by family who simply cannot afford to care for them [during the journey]” states Dr. Cynthia Maung of Mae Tao Clinic. Children and elders, the ones who suffer the most, cannot handle the physical demands that the journey entails and are left behind to wait for death.

The core issue in Myanmar is a violation of human rights. The military leaders continue to ignore and neglect the wellvbeing of its citizens, with many waiting for death because of inadequate health treatments. Given the junta’s hunger for power and control, most of the country’s expenditure is focused on building up an army rather than health services. As the military government becomes more power hungry and insecure, the rights and lives of these citizens are pushed aside. These people are entitled to medical care; it is the government’s obligation to take care of its citizens and their health should be the first priority. This injustice should be stopped and the only possible way is that other powerful states in the international community should intervene. However, many states are reluctant to intervene due to the bylaws of the state sovereignty. Still, we must consider that this is not a matter of people just being arrested, but people are dying and suffering from a lack of medical treatments. Should we stand by and allow this atrocity to continue?

2 comments:

SDR said...

I would first like to praise you for an excellent post, in terms of style, content, and graphics. This is a timely issue, but until I read your post I was unaware of the heath crisis faced by the people.
I would agree with you that this is a case where external forces must be set into motion in order to save the lives of the people of Burma. Where you stated "However, many states are reluctant to intervene due to the bylaws of the state sovereignty. Still, we must consider that this is not a matter of people just being arrested, but people are dying and suffering from a lack of medical treatments." I think is absolutely correct. As your post and links have informed me, this is not merely a matter of a military leadership oppressing its people, but a human rights violation which runs deeper. Without intervention by world powers, it would seem that the people of Burma will be in a sense, doomed to the mercy of a government which, as you have already made clear, has other priorities which do not include the wellbeing or health of its people.
While it may be helpful to have Doctors Without Borders and the Red Cross, with the restrictions that you brought to attention the government has placed upon their movement, it would seem clear that the only way to ensure the wellbeing of the people of Burma is for an aggressive intervention by outside powerful states.
Overall I found your post a great resource which certain enlightened me towards the true crisis within Burma and I would ultimately agree that this is certainly a time when intervention is warranted.

GZP said...

Thank you for writing an engaging post about such a pressing issue. I’m currently taking a Terrorism and Genocide class, and the situation in Myanmar looks like it is headed towards genocide, an international crime. Your links and blog post choices are effective; you choose both a person directly influence by the conflict, and someone with a background in economics. I enjoyed your comments on Yin’s post. You commend her argument, but you also offer another idea to the plate, economics. You’re right when you say that governments are not compelled enough by morality. There needs to be incentive, and you give a very rational explanation of how to initiate action against the junta. As for your comments on Sheldon’s post, I also would like to praise you for your efforts. You offer quotes in both of your comments, and you made an excellent argument, predicting the fate of the countries surrounding Burma if nothing is done to save the country. You wrote, “We must consider that the arrests and beatings in Burma will escalate in a migration of Burmese to bordering countries such as China.” Many countries are not isolated; if violence happens in one country, the refugees flee to bordering countries. This is one of the signature traits of a genocide and major international problem. I also partially agree that Sheldon’s skepticism of a military intervention is unrealistic. The United States has a history of ignoring external genocide because of its own self-interests and security; China also is trying to secure its interests. With that being said, I also can see why China would have to intervene in the conflict. Although your post was very interesting, I have a few suggestions below:

The first sentence of your post, which should be a strong introduction, is a bit unclear. If you could rearrange the wording, this would make your piece stronger. Also within the introduction paragraph, you write, “uphold the sanctions” when it should probably be past tense, using “upheld” instead. When you discuss that some countries are still funding Burma, you can connect that sentence with its following sentence. There is a period missing after the sentence describing Mg Yin’s qualifications. As for the spacings that lead up to your post, try to condense the title of the post, “comment:” and your comment together. This is merely for aesthetic purposes. Also, if you could make your pictures a little bigger, that would be greatly appreciated!

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.